Study: 3 in 4 Marketers Think “Perfect Attribution” Is Impossible

The number of marketers realizing the power of location data and tech for digital attribution continues to grow. However, many remain engaged in methods such as last-click, first-click, post-click, first-touch etc.

A new Econsultancy study produced in association with AdRoll (featured on MarketingCharts) surveyed 590 marketers in the UK, France and Germany, finding that almost three-quarters of respondents felt a “perfect attribution model” was impossible. In other words, according to these marketers, digital marketing efficacy remains unclear with no definitive method for determining how digital impacts bottom lines.

This lack of faith in data and technology to address the attribution challenge is a response to the limitations of current methods. While 48% utilized last-click attribution methods (the most of all methods featured), it was seen as one of the least effective with just 29% of users perceiving it to be “very effective.”

There was another interesting conclusion from the study. Based on attribution data and insights, these European marketers are more likely to decrease (46%) than increase (28%) spending across digital channels. In other words, attribution data are taking marketing dollars out of digital more than putting dollars into it.

There is no doubt that digital media is integral to the path to purchase by aiding in the omni-channel consumer. The problem is that attribution methods may not be adequately following the consumer from digital research to purchase.

econsultancyadroll-attribution-impact-european-digital-budgets-sept2016

As the chart above shows, there were also some interesting variations from channel to channel. For instance, 51% grew paid search budgets while only 25% decreased as a result of attribution data. Paid search attribution data is driving marketers to add more budget to the channel than decrease, which suggests marketers are seeing stronger performance than other channels.

Though paid search attribution data suggests strong ROI for marketers, other channels may be delivering similar results. The problem is current attribution methods fail to paint a complete and accurate picture of how the media helped drive an online or offline purchase.

Attribution remains a moving target for digital marketers which is precisely why location intelligence has emerged as an alternative to current attribution models. Location tactics weren’t part of the study, but it will be interesting to see how location challenges the industry’s approach to proving ROI.

Share Article...

Follow Us...

Stay ahead of the curve and get the latest on Local straight to your inbox.

By submitting this form, you agree to receive communications from Localogy. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Leave a Reply

Related Resources

Google AI Mode Now Plays Nice with Your Apps

Google AI Mode Now Plays Nice with Your Apps

Google this week announced the next logical evolution for AI Mode: the ability to link to and interact with users’ apps. This is meant to extend AI Mode’s functionality beyond answering questions to completing tasks across users’ frequent apps. In other words, it brings AI mode from answers to agent.

Did OpenAI Overestimate its Ad Revenue Potential?

Did OpenAI Overestimate its Ad Revenue Potential?

The latest development in OpenAI’s advertising saga has emerged. eMarketer reports that it’s pacing well below ad revenue projections. Specifically, the OpenAI is reportedly 90 percent off its mark, as it experiences growing pains in bringing sponsored answers & content to ChatGPT.

Why Is Apple Banning Home Services in Maps Ads?

Why Is Apple Banning Home Services in Maps Ads?

One of the biggest news items in the world of local media & marketing is Apple’s rollout of ads for the first time in Apple Maps. As we examined last week, this monetizes high-intent local searches from billions of Apple Maps users. But there’s a catch… home services ads are banned from the program.