Is $41.5 Million Enough for Fizz to Become the ‘Anti-Facebook’?

Sometimes what sounds like a lot of money isn’t very much at all. 

Many had this reaction when Elon Musk raised a reported $6 billion to fund xAI, his effort to catch up to, well, everyone in the AI race. 

No one claimed this wasn’t a ton of money. Yet many said a version of “he will need more” after the raise in May. It takes a lot of capital to play catch up vs. Microsoft and Google. And it takes a lot of capital to buy up tens of thousands of Nvidia GPUs. 

I had a similar “they’re going to need a bigger boat” reaction (if on a smaller scale) when I read about Fizz. This is an “anonymous” social media app that has been informally labeled as the “anti-Facebook.”

Meta’s European Problems Mount

The app was founded in 2021 by two Stanford dropouts (of course) and has focused on creating an anonymous social media experience for college and high school students. 

What So Great About Anonymity?

Why is anonymity a good idea? What about“keyboard courage”? This is the phenomenon of posting toxic content while hiding behind a fake username. It is a key reason so many want to regulate social media.

According to Forbes, at its inception, Fizz was designed as a safe place for college students to interact. 

The promise of anonymity among its users would prevent cliques from forming and dissolve the pressure among students to impress one another. Requiring users to log in with an academic email address, Fizz was a protected space for just students.”

The app hasn’t escaped controversy. 

According to a May article in the San Francisco Chronicle, “​​When the social media app Fizz first hit university campuses, college students signed up in droves to post anonymously about their professors, roommates, frat parties, or whatever else popped into their brains, which not surprisingly veered at times into bullying, racism, harassment, sexism, and other online abuse.”

So much so that the app has been banned on some college campuses in Florida and North Carolina. 

It’s not completely clear what Fizz intends to do with the $41+ million it has raised. However, it seems to us it will take a whole lot more to be the “anti-Facebook” which is how some describe the app. We are not sure if being the anti-Facebook means being the opposite of Facebook, which based on the numbers, it already is. 

Fizz is currently active on 240 college and 60 high school campuses. Facebook has 30 billion monthly active users and about $135 billion in annual revenue.  

I think in Fizz’s case the “anti-Facebook” positioning has more to do with the different target demos than anything else.

Share Article...

Follow Us...

Stay ahead of the curve and get the latest on Local straight to your inbox.

By submitting this form, you agree to receive communications from Localogy. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Related Resources

Google AI Mode Now Plays Nice with Your Apps

Google AI Mode Now Plays Nice with Your Apps

Google this week announced the next logical evolution for AI Mode: the ability to link to and interact with users’ apps. This is meant to extend AI Mode’s functionality beyond answering questions to completing tasks across users’ frequent apps. In other words, it brings AI mode from answers to agent.

Did OpenAI Overestimate its Ad Revenue Potential?

Did OpenAI Overestimate its Ad Revenue Potential?

The latest development in OpenAI’s advertising saga has emerged. eMarketer reports that it’s pacing well below ad revenue projections. Specifically, the OpenAI is reportedly 90 percent off its mark, as it experiences growing pains in bringing sponsored answers & content to ChatGPT.

Why Is Apple Banning Home Services in Maps Ads?

Why Is Apple Banning Home Services in Maps Ads?

One of the biggest news items in the world of local media & marketing is Apple’s rollout of ads for the first time in Apple Maps. As we examined last week, this monetizes high-intent local searches from billions of Apple Maps users. But there’s a catch… home services ads are banned from the program.