In our “digital consumer” era, customers juggle between devices throughout the day. As a result, the way people connect with local businesses is changing fast. Google’s recent Pigeon update strengthened the impact of “local” in consumers’ online searches and consequently, local listings started ranking higher in Google SERPs.

But being found isn’t the only thing listings facilitate. With new functionality and tools, listings are making it easier for consumers to actually interact with businesses directly on the SERP. The focus is shifting from displaying information to actually facilitating customer interactions and these new transactional relations are possible thanks to innovative services like online scheduling, and other call-to-actions (CTAs).

In a recent article on Street Fight, Greg Sterling, VP of strategy and insights at LSA, predicted online scheduling would be “much more prevalent for SMBs” this year. In addition, a recent Google-Ipsos study showed that 61% found click to call extremely important during the purchase phase. And one of the main reasons why consumers want to call a business is to schedule an appointment (51%).

As listing sites begin to explore adding more functionality to search results like online scheduling, it is worth exploring which business segments are most likely to adopt booking systems. Lucky for you, we have figures.

We asked one of our partners to share the list of the most represented segments on their directory site. In parallel, a partner surveyed 7,000 local online directory advertisers to identify the segments with highest interest in adopting scheduling tools. This is what we found:


Agendize: Users, Adopters and Impact of Online Scheduling from Local Search Association

We see that the segments with the highest potential for adoption coincide directly with the prevalent business categories present on local business listings. To me, it sounds like a clear indication that CTAs are the next stage of evolution from search to transaction.

Click me

One Response

  1. The infographic does not clearly show data that proves your main point: Consumers want online scheduling.

    Yes, 51% look to schedule an appointment… but how many people of that 51% prefer phone vs online booking? That’s the real number that would show consumer interest in online scheduling.

    I’m not doubting that the interest might be on the rise, I love online scheduling tools too like TimeTrade and ZocDoc… but the infographic does not show “Interest in Online Scheduling Tools Grows”. To show growth, you would also need to show previous numbers to see how much it grew.

    Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Related Resources

Instagram Opens eCommerce to SMBs

This is the latest in Localogy’s Skate To Where the Puck is Going series. Running semi-weekly, it examines the moves and motivations of tech giants as leading